According to Acemoglu in non-democratic societies , where political power is in the hands of a single party happens that economic power controller to maintain a low level of taxes , and also create barriers to opening the domestic market to a market economy this to save power their intact . In democratic societies , the opposite occurs : does political power and the poor who benefit from a redistributive tax system . Also existing manufacturers in the market fail to establish barriers to prevent entry into the market of potential producers .
In the early stages of establishing dictatorial systems record high levels of economic growth this because the first generation of entrepreneurs and producers do not need all competition on technological competition to have a high economic performance .
But this is not valid when it comes to a long term time when technological change rates go high enough . In such cases the cost to meet domestic insulation market is much higher than that which comes from liberalization . Not let competition work mechanism means be prepared for crisis and collapse of the political system . For this reason the path of democracy is the safest for economic development in the long term.If we like the fact that liberal democracies mirëqen respect fundamental human rights is not acceptable the idea of those who think that we need to activate the levers of economic development to achieve democracy . This can not be sacrificed for the rights of the current generation in order to enjoy generations to come .